The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around May 201, the Defendant: (a) at the D office located in Yangju-si, Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”); (b) made a written petition using a computer to access the Cheongdae-si website; and (c) prepared and damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by submitting a written petition to “the victim F, a representative director of E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”), who is a corporate director, who is a representative director, without using any means to protect himself/herself; and (d) making it extremely low-quality, and inappropriate for the company to take advantage of it; and (e) making it difficult and inappropriate for the company to take advantage of it; and (e) making it difficult for him/her to take advantage of it; and (e) making it difficult for him/her to take advantage of it; and (e) making it difficult for him/her to take it out to this society.”

2. We examine the judgment. The case is a crime falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant on August 26, 2013, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.