The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On May 26, 2013, at the scene of traffic accident verification conducted in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu on May 26, 2013, the Defendant: (a) discovered that the victim C was operating a petroleum retail shop under the trade name of the victim C; and (b) notwithstanding the fact that the victim did not sell petroleum and gas, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts to the effect that “I would have sold petroleum and gas capacity, and would not be a habitual offender,” at the place where the business owner and the traffic manager are the mother.

2. We examine the judgment. The case is a crime falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant on July 19, 2013, after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.