logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.11.29 2016가단53409
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Around March 11, 2015, Plaintiff A discharged Plaintiff A from the hospital after being hospitalized in an individual hospital as of the 01:34 Gutoo, and as of the low-tension rate of 01:34 on March 11, 2015. (2) Plaintiff A was in the emergency room of the hospital as of March 14, 2015. (3) around 22:0, 2015, Plaintiff A was in the hospital, and was in blood test and CT photography at the hospital.

On March 15, 2015, the E Hospital drafted a written request for medical treatment of the Plaintiff “other acute infections (R/O) with the detailed acute impulses (R/O), and of the detailed female pelle’s symptoms.”

3) On March 15, 2015, Plaintiff A was admitted to the emergency department of the Defendant Hospital on March 15, 2015, and responded to the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital that “I have no sex experience” (the Defendant Hospital’s completion records on March 15, 2015, stating that “I have no sex experience, and there is no possibility of per se infection” was stated in the Defendant Hospital’s completion records on March 15, 2015, and that F was released from G at 02:45 on the same day and at 03:05 on the same day.

(4) Around 10:20 on March 15, 2015, the outside of the Defendant Hospital and the medical professionals performed the culptive surgery against the Plaintiff A of the culptive surgery.

[Attachment, the Defendant hospital’s medical records indicated that “Abnvic s in pelvic mga, focal matoma (in the alley, partial blood mar, etc.) is observed in the surgery report.” The Defendant hospital and medical personnel discussed to the effect that there was a phenomenon in the surgery between the Plaintiff and the surgery, and that the surgery was caused by the surgery between the Plaintiff and the father and the medical personnel.”

5) On March 17, 2015, Plaintiff A discharged the Defendant Hospital on March 17, 2015 (6) Plaintiff A re-hospitalized the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital on March 18, 2015, with the former symptoms, and under the diagnosis, Plaintiff A received treatment, and discharged on March 23, 2015.

B. On March 26, 2015, Plaintiff A, including the father and the medical examiner of the Defendant Hospital, was enrolled in the father and father of the Defendant Hospital on March 26, 2015, and the father and the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital. “The father and the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital had been suffering from proba, so far as they had been suffering from proba, so far as they had been suffering from probacy before every year.”

arrow