(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.10.24 2018고단3731

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.10.24 2018고단3731

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

When the Defendant, by using the so-called “Sishing” method, acquired the amount of damage through the crime of telecommunications financing fraud, he/she was willinged to commit the crime of telecommunications financing fraud by taking charge of the so-called “cash collection” role in collecting the amount of damage to the victim and the account owner in accordance with the direction of the “B Act by one person.”

On July 12, 2018, in a place where it is not possible to know the location of the light on July 12, 2018, the name infinites would allow the victim C to get loans provided by the Government.

When the existing loan is repaid first, the credit rating will be higher, and it will proceed with a substitute loan at a low interest rate.

“Falsely speaks to the effect that “Around July 17, 2018, if the victim wired the amount of KRW 23 million to an account designated by telephone to the victim on July 17, 2018, the credit is recovered and the loan is possible at an annual interest rate of 4.3% up to 38 million won.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the name-free person was not a member of the D Bank, and even if he received money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to make a low-interest exchange loan.

Nevertheless, as seen above, the name-free person deceiving the victim, and caused the victim to transfer the victim to the post office account (F) in the name of E on July 17, 2018, KRW 15 million, and KRW 23 million on July 17, 2018, KRW 8 million on July 11, 2018, and KRW 23 million on July 17, 2018, and the account owner E was released from the post office of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, in the name of the account, around 11:40 on July 17, 2018, and the defendant was arrested to the police officer who was dispatched after receiving the report while misrepresenting the lending company G representative to deliver the damaged amount of damage.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired the property of the victim in collusion with the name of the handicapped.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (the time and twice of the examination of the accused);

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and C;

1. C, H, and I, respectively.

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2018.12.13 2018고단4269

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.10 2018고단1624

-서울남부지방법원 2017.04.27 2017고단982

-서울남부지방법원 2018.10.17 2018고단2105

-서울남부지방법원 2018.07.05 2017고단3761