A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

The seized one prepaid cards (C) (No. 18), .

Punishment of the crime

The nameless person is the total liability of the telecommunications financing fraud organization that receives money from victims by misrepresenting himself/herself with a financial institution and a lending company, etc., and the defendant serves as a person who receives a cash card connected to the account used in the crime in accordance with the direction of the nameless person and withdraws the amount of fraudulent damage and transfers it to another account designated by the non-nameable

The Defendant, along with his name influences, made it possible for a member of the organization of telecommunications fraud crime organizations, including the name influences, to borrow money at a low interest rate to the other party who received a telephone without obtaining a return loan, and made the other party transfer money to a certain account in the name of the repayment of the existing loan, the expenses for monitoring the Financial Supervisory Service, etc., and made the other party do so. The Defendant, upon receiving a cash card from the name influences, made the cash transfer to the other party. After withdrawing the money transferred to the other account, the Defendant, according to the instructions of the name influences, conspired to commit telecommunications fraud by sharing each of the roles

1. On February 27, 2018, the name influor of an organization affiliated with a telecommunications finance fraud crime that misrepresents the employees of the one savings bank may receive a loan at a low interest rate if the payment of the Samsung Card is paid in full.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

In fact, however, the above-mentioned person did not have the intention or ability to execute the loan to the victim as an organization member of telecommunications fraud crime organization.

The above person who was dissatisfyed by deceiving the victim as above and let the victim transfer KRW 3,239,418 to the bank account (H) in the name of G on the same day, and the defendant withdraw KRW 3,230,000 among them, and then wired it to the account directed by the person in an unsatisfying name.

2. Attempted fraud;

(a) Telecommunications fraud misrepresenting the staff of the Han Savings Bank;