logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2014.09.17 2014고정266
협박등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the victim C (n, 45 years of age) and the victim C.

The defendant, around July 2013, is currently in a divorce lawsuit after her husband D and her husband D fighting.

Although the Defendant was trying to move to 105 Dong 208, Gangnam-si, which had been the former, the Defendant did not have a good appraisal of the victim when the victim, her husband F, her husband F, her husband D, her husband D, her mother H, etc. were set up on the above apartment.

1. On November 14, 2013, the Defendant sent to the Defendant’s home located in Gangnam-si I and 3th century a letter, “The Defendant: (a) made it necessary for the Defendant to do so; (b) forged documents; and (c) made it necessary for the Defendant to go to the Defendant’s home at the Defendant’s home; (d) 10:56 on November 14, 2013, the Defendant sent to the Defendant’s cell phone (the Victim’s children) with the word “I and J that I will find a school.”

At around 14:30 on the same day, the Defendant continued to find the “N Teaching institute” of the victim’s operation in Gangseo-si M, and expressed the victim’s desire to do so, and the Defendant stated that “I will come to a flue in the three times, and I would like to give a flue in front of flue relationship. I will not operate it.”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim by showing the same attitude to inflict harm on the children of the victim.

2. On November 14, 2013, around 23:24, the Defendant posted the Defendant’s “Canadian Stockholm” protruding message to the Defendant’s “Kakaogle,” and on the 16th day of the same month, the Defendant posted the Defendant’s message to the Defendant’s “Isnish, Isnish, Isnish, and Isnish,” “Isnish, Isnish, and Isnish,” “Isnish, Isnish, Isnish,” and “Isnish,” respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Kakao Stockholm screen (suspects);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the Kakao Stockholm screen (the Kakao content sent to K);

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow