1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff: (a) laid down the 10 framework and the 2 framework of view owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant objects”) within the site for the port-to-port quantity storage site located in Yancheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gu, the head of the Yan-gun Office (hereinafter “instant site”); (b) the Defendant arbitrarily discarded the instant objects without the Plaintiff’s consent on April 6, 2012; and (c) sought compensation for damages equivalent to the value.

It is insufficient to find that the statements in Gap evidence 1-1 through 4, 7, 8-1 through 11, 9-1, 9-1 through 4, 10, 14, 16, 17, 19, and 26, and Eul evidence No. 10-14, 10, 17, 19, and 26 are also disposed of by the defendant while disposing of wastes accumulated in the site of this case without the plaintiff's consent (it is difficult to confirm that the above evidence alone was all asserted by the plaintiff in the site of this case), and there is no other evidence to find that the above evidence was all asserted by the plaintiff in the site of this case, and further, the statements in the evidence No. 6-1, 2, and 11-1 through 4 are sufficient to find that the value of the property of this case reaches 46,000,000, and there is no evidence to find otherwise. Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion above is without merit.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.