logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2020.02.18 2019가단318474
코인 반환청구 등
Text

1. The Defendants shall jointly:

A. It delivers to the Plaintiff A 90,000 out of the coaches listed in the [Attachment List No. 1].

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendants are simplified mother and child, and the Plaintiffs are the figures of Defendant D, the mother of Defendant E.

B. Defendant E asked Defendant D to the effect that, even though he did not have entered as a member of the extraction site in Daejeon, he did not have the ability to purchase the non-mixed capital at a container, Defendant E asked Defendant D to the effect that, “I will immediately repay by increasing the number of coaches because I were able to purchase the nose because I were able to make a nose investment and to purchase it at a container in the extraction site in Daejeon, and I would like to purchase it in a container without being able to purchase it.”

C. However, Defendant E was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for one year (Ulsan District Court 2019No954, hereinafter “relevant criminal case”) on August 9, 2019, and the above judgment became final and conclusive after appeal.

On October 10, 2018, the Defendant (referring to the “Plaintiff” in this case; hereinafter the same shall apply) committed against A (the “Defendant E” in this case) made the Victim’s mother (the “Defendant D” in this case; hereinafter the same shall apply) to make a false statement to the Victim’s (the “G” virtual currency brokerage exchange operated by the injured Party A on the fiveth floor of the F building in Busan Dong-gu, Busan, to the effect that “G” from the injured Party was able to use the MECN CASH as gambling funds, and the Defendant’s mother (the “Defendant D” in this case; hereinafter the same shall apply) knew of the fact that he did not intend to use it as gambling funds, although he did not wish to use it for investment, he was able to make the Victim’s Coin investments. If the U.S. is lent, he would have to pay the number rapidly through trading.”

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, received 10,000 U.S. dollars equivalent to the market price of 20,000,000 from the victim under the name of the same day.

(b) a victim;

arrow