1. The Defendant’s KRW 19,010,00 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from January 5, 2017 to March 6, 2018.

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

(a) Business name - A project name: A road project (B) - A public notice:

B. Change in land to be expropriated 1) The Plaintiff is a Dol (hereinafter referred to as “D”) under the North Korean old group.

(E) 1,613 square meters of land E and F site 499 square meters of land (hereinafter “total land”).

(2) However, as part of the entire land is incorporated into the instant project site, the entire land was divided into ① 522 square meters of the E site, ② 501 square meters of the G site, ③ 590 square meters of the H site, ④ 446 square meters of the F site, ⑤ 53 square meters of the I site.

3) The Plaintiff and the Defendant, among the entire land on the instant project site, are 501 square meters of G site incorporated into the instant project site, 590 square meters of H site, and 53 square meters of I site (hereinafter “land”).

In the end, the land subject to expropriation was admitted to the sum of KRW 19,785,400 (= = 87,549,750 (G) KRW 102,984,50 (H) KRW 9,251,150 (I)) according to the adjudication rendered by the Central Land Expropriation Committee on October 22, 2015. Meanwhile, the land subject to expropriation was admitted to the sum of KRW 19,785,40 (G) ( KRW 102,984,50 (H)) and KRW 9,251,150 (I). Meanwhile, the remaining land subject to expropriation is the sum of KRW 522 square meters of the E site and KRW 446 square meters

4) The liquidation of this portion is as follows:

The current status of the division and incorporation of the land to be expropriated in the instant land subject to expropriation after dividing the entire land category into the entire land category before dividing it into the entire land category and the current status of the division and incorporation of the land to be expropriated in large E 1,613 E, 613 E, 522 E, 522 G 501 G 501 H 501 G 501 H 590 H 590 H 590 F 4446, 53 I 53 [Attachment 1] of the land to be expropriated.

C. The Plaintiff filed a claim for purchase and expropriation of the remaining land of this case with the Defendant to purchase the remaining land of this case, but the Defendant rejected the claim and failed to reach an agreement.

The remaining land of this case is once it is possible to enter and enter the national highway directly, but the difference between the remaining land and the remaining land is 11m.