Seoul High Court 2008Nu28310 (No. 15, 2009)

The legitimacy of the assertion that the actual operator of the private teaching institute has been a separate operator and only lent only the name.

It is reasonable to view the amount returned after the closure of a private teaching institute as the total sum of the details of return of contributions and distribution of profits for the operation of the private teaching institute. In full view of other circumstances such as the role in the process of the establishment and operation of the private teaching institute in this case, the Plaintiff appears to

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

The appeal shall be dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiff.

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's grounds of appeal fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by