A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On October 19, 2010, the defendant was sentenced to a fine of eight million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on June 2010, and on April 26, 2012, the defendant was sentenced to a fine of eight million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on April 26, 201 and was punished for a drunk driving four times.

1. The accused is a person engaged in the duty of driving a B car in violation of the Road Traffic Act, the Road Traffic Act, the Road Traffic Act, and the Road Traffic Act;

On February 20, 2013, at around 01:20, the Defendant driven the said car with a blood alcohol content of 0.116% while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license on February 20, 2013, and led to the flow of the north Tririri-gu North Korea in the flow of the vehicle bypassing the North Triri-ri distance from the old and the North Tri-gu North Korean middle school room.

At night, there was a center line installed, and thus there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the vehicle by complying with the vehicle line and accurately operating the steering and steering devices for the driver of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left from the front side of the Maren-Jak School, which is owned by the victim D, who was driven by the signal belt C, to turn to the left from the front side of the Maren-Jak-gu. The Defendant received the left part of the Karen-pur car after the driver's seat of the Karen-pur-packing car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures, even after destroying and damaging the repair cost of KRW 318,00,00, such as fences, painting, etc., after the Defendant’s vehicle.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), operated a B car with no mandatory insurance policy.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;