1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 8, 2015, the Defendant filed a claim against the Plaintiff, a patentee, for a trial to confirm the scope of patent rights (No claim 4 of the instant patent invention) seeking confirmation (No claim 2015Da2195) against the Intellectual Property Tribunal (hereinafter “instant petition for trial”).

(2) On December 16, 2015, the Defendant submitted an amendment to specify the invention subject to confirmation by correcting the description of the invention subject to confirmation based on the “product 4(KCH309)” that he/she claimed in the Intellectual Property Tribunal.

3) On March 10, 2016, the Korean Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board rendered a trial ruling accepting the instant request for a trial to the effect that “an invention subject to confirmation is legally identified, and is worked by the Defendant, and does not fall under the scope of the right of claims 4 among the instant patent inventions. (b) The Plaintiff’s title of the instant patent invention (Evidence A No. 2) invention: the Plaintiff’s combination structure and manufacturing method 2) / the filing date and registration number / the registration number / the date of June 11, 1998 (No. 11/0283600, Dec. 11, 200). The summary of the instant patent invention is that the instant patent invention is an Elecifta huck to fix the semiconductor wafer, and is an apparatus fixed by using semiconductor wafers.

It is about the combination structure and manufacturing method of the pre-mix, the board board,

(B) In the past, the connection structure of mixings according to the previous technology was caused by an influent deterioration caused by corrosion, short line, or low melting compound of Mabn Den, and as a result, Mag (Ag) Magyal metal sources or ionions coming into a stude with an influent body and leading electricity to an influent body, such Mag is caused by an influent operation of circuit board.

Due to the occurrence of an influence caused by this Act.

(2) The instant case.