1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. (1) On February 15, 2016, the Plaintiff asserted that “the invention subject to confirmation by the Defendant falls under the scope of the right of the invention described in the Plaintiff’s claim 1, 3, and 5 through 9 among the instant patented inventions,” and filed a claim seeking confirmation of the scope of right (2016Da374) with the Intellectual Property Tribunal.

(2) On July 11, 2017, the Korean Intellectual Property Tribunal rendered the instant trial ruling dismissing the Plaintiff’s appeal on the ground that “The invention subject to confirmation does not include all the inventions described in Claim 1, 3, 5, or 9 among the instant patented inventions (the “Slber shall provide “The Rober-designated Track and No. Ro-B to the above Apt”) and does not fall within the scope of the right.”

B. The Plaintiff’s title of the instant patent invention (A) invention: (2) filing date of the personal information security system (2)/registration date/registration number: March 13, 2012/ 11/ September 11, 2012/ No. 1183575 (3) of the Patent Act) is omitted.

【Request No. 1’s transfer; 2. In the personal information security system that includes the servers; 2. (hereinafter “class 1-1”), when the user outputss a document, the user collected printed data by controlling the printing press of the operating system (a) (OS) and detect personal information from among the above data (hereinafter “class 1-2”); the server provides the foregoing data-based standard-based base-(hereinafter “class 1-3”); the server provides all the cases where the document is stored and not stored in the file (hereinafter “class 1-4”); the personal information security system (hereinafter “instant Claim No. 1”).