The defendant shall be innocent.

Around February 28, 2013, the Defendant in the factory office purchased the “E” insurance products of the victim D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter the victim Co., Ltd.) through the insurance designer C (hereinafter the victim Co., Ltd.) at the restaurant that the Defendant was working in the city B located in the city where he had been employed on February 28, 2013. Although he was diagnosed at the F Hospital with knee snee snee snee snee snee snekes, and was hospitalized for 53 days from March 8, 2010 to April 29, 2010, during the preparation of the contract’s former notification obligation, the fact that the Defendant received the following medical treatments [the following medical treatments (the hospitalization, operation, continued hospitalization for at least seven days, consecutively for at least 30 days] through a medical examination or examination

1. The phrase “not” column was written.

Defendant: (a) deceiving the victim company; (b) had the victim company take out insurance; and (c) had the victim company take out the insurance; and (d) was diagnosed with acute Minister salt at the H hospital located in Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu; and (c) received hospitalized treatment for 19 days from January 20, 2014 to February 7, 2014.

In addition, from around February 11, 2014 to around July 4, 2016, it received total of 7,415,058 won by deceiving the victim company through the same method over 12 times, such as the list of crimes in the attached crime list from around that time to around July 4, 2016.

Judgment

Even if an insurance contractor is an insurer in violation of the obligation of disclosure under the Commercial Act, the insurance money is not paid only by the insurance contract, but only by the accident occurred. Therefore, there was an intentional deception on the part of the insurance contractor for the fraud of the insurance money solely on the basis that the insurance contractor violated the obligation of disclosure under the Commercial Act.

No contract shall be concluded.

Furthermore, even though the insured events have already occurred, insurance contracts are concluded or insurance contracts are aware that the possibility of the occurrence of the insured events has deteriorated.