logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.07.21 2016노53
사기
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1) In the instant case, the Defendant’s charge of hospitalized treatment for which the Defendant claimed insurance money in the instant case was merely due to an injury caused by a traffic accident that occurred around November 24, 2009 and around November 9, 2010, such as an surgery on the part of an unclaimed and an ex post facto transplant surgery, and a video skin transplant surgery. Defendant 1 was irrelevant to the hospital record that had not been notified at the time of entering into an insurance contract, and thus, the Defendant had an intention to commit fraud.

subsection (b) of this section.

2) The lower court’s unfair sentencing (an amount of KRW 1.5 million) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s above sentence is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The summary of the facts charged is a person who had been hospitalized from January 7, 2005 to April 2, 2009, due to the clothes, alley flusium, flusium flusium, flusium flusium flusium, etc.

A. Although the Defendant was aware of the fact that he had to undergo continuous medical treatment on April 28, 2009 due to hurgical pain, etc., he was aware of the fact that the Defendant had to undergo continuous medical treatment, such as daily allowances when he was admitted to a local damage insurance company, and that he was diagnosed by a doctor within the last three months, or was diagnosed by a doctor through a diagnosis and examination, or received treatment, hospitalization, surgery, and medication.

“The results of a medical examination and examination conducted by a doctor within the last five years, and after which the result of the examination was hospitalized, performed, conducted, conducted a close examination (the heart, radiation, medical examination, etc.), or conducted for at least seven consecutive days, or for at least 30 days, for which the enemy was administered.”

The term "influence to questions" refers to an insurance solicitor and entered into an insurance contract, and received hospitalized treatment at a hospital from March 16, 2010 to 19 days from March 16, 2010.

On April 7, 2010, the defendant entered into an insurance contract normally by claiming insurance proceeds on April 7, 201

The payment of KRW 570,00,00 from the injured company for the same day as the insurance money, from that time, shall be made from that time.

arrow