logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.11.17 2013가단105447
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly committed against the Plaintiff KRW 40,191,797 and KRW 21,00,000 among them, respectively, from May 23, 2014, and from May 19, 191.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. A land ownership relationship (1) E (the former name: F) owns 140/302 square meters of G road, G road, and 179 square meters of the said H road, the Plaintiff owns 302 square meters of G road, and owns 162/302 square meters of the said G road and 29 square meters of the said I road and 528 square meters of the said J road, respectively.

(2) The Plaintiff is operating a factory on the ground, where necessary, on the ground that the land category and size are indicated. (3),880 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the “land indication”) of K site in Sung-si adjacent to the south of the instant road. (2) The Plaintiff is operating a factory on the ground.

(3) The road of this case is a total of about 150 meters in packaging to ensure the passage of vehicles. The length is about a total of 150 meters, and it is linked to L land in the form of a projecting extending into the west, the west end is connected to L, and the west end is connected to local highway M, which is a package of one-lane. The plaintiff uses the road of this case as the plaintiff's factory entry.

(4) The Plaintiff, at around 2003 when establishing a factory, set up a steel entry door at the entrance of G land connected to M, and entered into a security service contract with Swon Co., Ltd. around April 2007, marked that the CCTV was a three-way guard zone in the steel pole. On August 201, 201, the Plaintiff concluded a contract with Swon for the sale of safety products, and installed CCTV at the vicinity of the steel pole, and installed a warning board informing the general public of the prohibition of entry into the road of this case on the boundary of the steel pole and J land.

In addition, the Plaintiff installed a boundary fence on the boundary of the J land adjoining the N land and L land, but around May 2013, the Plaintiff installed a boundary fence.

B. (1) Defendant B, C, and seven other persons (the Defendant C’s spouse is Defendant B), around September 2010, have obtained consent from Q to use land regarding the land of 16,751 square meters of O forest and P forest and 7,576 square meters of land (hereinafter “instant development site”). On January 24, 201, the instant development site is multi-household dwelling from the Sung-market as to the instant development site.

arrow