1. The plaintiff's action against the Central Land Expropriation Committee shall be dismissed.

2. The defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation shall:

1. Basic facts

(a) Business authorization and public notice - Housing site development projects (B-1) - Housing site development projects (B-1) - on May 30, 2008 - Project operator C publicly announced by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on May 13, 201 (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”): The starting date of expropriation: July 6, 2011 - The objects of expropriation and compensation for losses: The same shall apply to entries in the list of the details of compensation and the column of compensation for expropriation.

(2) The lower court determined that each of the lands subject to expropriation indicated in the separate sheet is “each of the instant lands.” - An appraisal corporation: A new appraisal corporation in the future, a Pacific appraisal corporation, a Pacific appraisal corporation (hereinafter “appraisal for expropriation”) and a Pacific appraisal corporation (hereinafter “appraisal for expropriation,” and the result of the appraisal is referred to as “appraisal for expropriation”) based on the standard land comparison, and the lower court determined that each of the lands subject to expropriation indicated in the separate sheet is “each of the instant lands.”

C. The appraisal result of appraiser I (hereinafter “court appraiser”) - The court appraisal statement in the annexed Form No. 1 (hereinafter “court appraisal”) shall calculate the compensation for the plaintiff, such as the statement in the court appraisal column in the annexed Form No. 1 (hereinafter “court appraisal”). - The court appraiser selected each of the above lands, which the appraisal appraiser selected as the comparative standard sheet, as the comparative standard sheet, where the land use status, surrounding environment, etc. of this case are similar among the reference land in the surrounding areas of this case, and where the highest similarity in the price level, etc.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy Facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 15, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (if any, including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and images; the inquiry results on the court appraiser; the witness I's testimony; the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The amount of compensation determined by the Plaintiff’s assertion and appraisal of acceptance and appraisal is unlawful, published and determined in relation to the selection of comparative standard land.