logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.25 2016나27312
용역대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

According to the respective descriptions and the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 4 through 20, the plaintiff entered into a design and manufacturing contract with the defendant about Morse (including value-added tax) around April 2015 with the service cost of KRW 7,582,30 (including value-added tax) for Morse show-related design and manufacturing contract. The plaintiff can recognize the facts that the above posters, etc. were manufactured and delivered or displayed to the defendant according to the defendant's instruction.

(B) The Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff claims excessive costs of production, etc., but there is no evidence to deem that the Plaintiff claimed excessive costs of service. Accordingly, the Defendant’s assertion is not accepted). According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount calculated at the rate of 15% per annum as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from July 10, 2015 to the date of delivery of the original original payment order, as sought by the Plaintiff.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow