logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.06.23 2015가합1624
소유권에대한권리회복
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. In a civil suit regarding the legality of the instant lawsuit, the purport of the claim is to be stated in the complaint necessary for the purpose of specifying the subject matter of the lawsuit and the scope of the trial by the court, and its contents and scope should be clearly specified so that it can be clearly identified. The lawsuit for which the purport of the claim is not clearly specified is unlawful.

On April 21, 2015, this Court recommended the Plaintiff to clearly indicate the purport of the claim stated in the complaint, and the Plaintiff made a shipment of the amendment on April 30, 2015. However, the content and scope of the claim in this case are not specified in detail, which is not corrected thereafter. Ultimately, the claim in this case cannot be deemed to have been specified.

2. The instant lawsuit is unlawful and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow