1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. In a civil lawsuit, the purport of the claim shall be specifically stated in the complaint for the purpose of specifying the subject matter of the lawsuit and the scope of the trial by the court, so that the content and scope thereof can be clearly identified, and the lawsuit for which the purport of the claim is not clearly specified is unlawful.

However, since the Plaintiff merely stated the purport of the complaint that “the Defendant compensates the Plaintiff for damages,” and did not specify the specific amount of the claim at all, the instant lawsuit cannot be deemed to have clearly identified the purport of the claim, and thus, is unlawful.

2. In addition, the exercise of the right to a trial may be regulated by the principle of good faith in order to protect the other party and to secure the judicial function (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 96Da226, Dec. 23, 1997). The fact that the plaintiff filed the lawsuit in this case without paying the stamp and the service fee is clear in the record. The plaintiff filed several lawsuits where the claim and the cause of the claim are not specified, like the lawsuit in this case, without attaching stamp, etc. to the complaint in the complaint in the same manner as the lawsuit in this case, and it is obvious that the plaintiff received a new complaint rejection order, dismissal ruling, etc. by refusing to comply with the order of correction. As such, the lawsuit in this case may not be permitted as it creates unnecessary consumption of judicial personnel and confusion and confusion in judicial function.

3. If so, since the lawsuit of this case is unlawful and cannot be corrected, it is decided to dismiss without pleading. It is so decided as per Disposition.