The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A was engaged in the general affairs of the D Farmers Countermeasure Committee, and Defendant B was the spouse of the above A, and the farmland in E was leased from the prop.

1. Fraud against victim F and G;

A. In the Defendants’ house located at H on June 17, 2009, the Defendants made a false statement to the effect that “the victims are entering into a new city by carrying out D housing site development projects at I in the Korean Land Corporation.” However, the Defendants were entitled to the right to sell commercial buildings from the Korean Land Corporation if a vinyl, which is a livestock facility, is installed in a sand shed, to receive the right to sell commercial buildings from the Korean Land Corporation as compensation for livelihood countermeasures.”

However, according to the criteria for compensation set by the Korea Land Corporation, only the livestock raiser who had been engaged in the livestock industry before June 12, 2006, the base date, is subject to the right to sell commercial buildings, since the victims could not be entitled to the right to sell commercial buildings because they did not actually engage in the livestock industry even if they purchased livestock facilities, such as plastic houses, from the Defendants, even if they purchased livestock facilities from the Defendants. Therefore, the Defendants did not have the intent

As above, the Defendants, by deceiving the victims as above, received from the victim F the total sum of KRW 50 million in the name of the purchase price of the plastic houses and the three-dimensional units of land lease, from the victim F, and KRW 73.5 million in the total amount of KRW 20 million on July 20, 2009, and KRW 8.5 million in the name of the purchase price of the plastic houses and the three-dimensional units of land lease from the victim G, namely, from the victim G, KRW 18 million in the total amount of KRW 9.5 million in the purchase price of the plastic houses and the three-dimensional units of land lease.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce victims to receive the goods.

B. On December 2009, the Defendants, together with the victims, told the victims of the false statement that the Defendants “as long as they must pay a bonus to the prop and the employees of the Korea Land and Housing Corporation in order to have the right of sale at home, KRW 80,000 per unit per unit.”

However, the Defendant is above.