Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 11, 2013, from around 22:40 to 23:05 of the same day, Defendant A, a property damage, at Eju stores operated by the victim B in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the victim did not sell alcohol to the Defendant, and the Defendant changed the taxi expenses, but the Defendant was in the location on the ground that the victim did not pay the taxi expenses, but the Defendant was on the ground that he did not pay the taxi expenses, and the Defendant was on the floor of the cooling pipe, large-sized air rackers, three food racks, and the strings of the repair expenses.

2. Defendant A interfered with the business of Defendant A caused disturbance to the victim B by force, such as harming the cooling room and glass at the above time and at the above place, damaging and gathering the cryp, etc., and allowing customers under the name of an unsatisfing to leave the place, and allowing them to leave the place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business and the selection of fines) for the defendant A who has the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Defendant A among concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A of the provisional payment order: Division of a crime under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Defendant B of this part of the facts charged is a person who conducts general restaurant business in the name of E in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

No general restaurant shall be equipped with sound and rebuttal facilities to allow customers to sing.

Nevertheless, around August 8, 2013, the above defendant had facilities such as video reflecters, two automatic reflectrs, and other sound devices, etc., and had customers singing and singing in the above restaurant.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion shall be the restaurant of this case at the time of the instant case.