logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.04.10 2013고단1381
식품위생법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant of the 2013 Highest 1381 case is a person who operates a general restaurant with the trade name of “D” from the Gu C and the fourth floor during Ansan-si.

The Defendant, who violated the order of suspension of business, was ordered by the head of the Gu to suspend the business of the above restaurant from August 19, 2013 to October 2, 2013, on the ground that he/she violated matters to be observed by the general restaurant business operator by allowing customers to singing with sound and reflect facilities in the above “D”, which is a general restaurant.

Nevertheless, from September 9, 2013 to September 25, 2013, the Defendant continued to engage in the above restaurant business in violation of an order of business suspension, such as cooking and selling safe, alcoholic beverages, etc. to many unspecified customers who found the above restaurant.

(b) No general restaurant business operator who violates the code of practice shall operate his/her business in such a manner as to allow customers to sing with sound and reflect facilities;

Nevertheless, at around 23:40 on September 25, 2013, the Defendant violated matters to be observed by general restaurant operators by allowing e, etc. who have been found as customers to have automatic reflectrs, microphones, and reflective facilities in the above restaurant.

2. The Defendant received an order to close down his/her place of business as of October 7, 2013, on the ground that he/she was operating a general restaurant in the name of “D” at Ansan-si C and fourth level during the period of business suspension, on the ground that he/she was conducting business during the period of business suspension.

Nevertheless, from October 8, 2013 to October 17, 2013, the Defendant continued to engage in the restaurant business in violation of an order to close down the restaurant by cooking and selling, etc., to many unspecified customers who found the restaurant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the accused in the first protocol of trial;

1. A written accusation;

1. Notification of additional materials for businesses violating the Food Sanitation Act;

1. Investigation reports (Binding of administrative data, such as closure of business);

1. Data on administrative disposition and disclosure;

1. Business notification certificate;

arrow