A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than four years and six months.

All applications filed by applicants for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 929] The defendant is the representative director of the "F", who operates the sn beamline project to vicariously publicize and advertise the company.

The Defendant: (a) purchased video machinery called “sn beam beam project” at KRW 1,210,00 (including all installation expenses, etc.) at the market price; (b) free of charge, installed it in a restaurant and beauty room, etc. used by the general public to provide the business owner (victim) with the video of the sn beam beam project; and (c) had the company run the company with the advertisement of an enterprise separately received from the video and received advertising expenses.

The Defendant, on September 23, 2014, at the “I” restaurant for the operation of the Victim H in Suwon-si G on September 23, 2014, intended to install and operate the sn beam project video machinery at free of charge inside the restaurant.

If a company that wants to advertise at the bottom of the screen gets a "drawing advertisement", the advertisement profit will be high.

The sn beamline price and the installation cost of the project are 7 million won, and the above amount is loaned from Samsung Card Company in the name of the victim.

The loan made a false statement to the effect that it shall be paid in the manner of paying a certain amount of monthly installments with the monthly advertising revenue generated from the LOF, so there is no doubt about the establishment price of the sn beam project.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the ability to invest in the fund because it is extremely difficult to operate the company due to the continuance of the enemy up to 200 million won per month, and the defendant entered into a contract with the advertising company and the sn beam project 200 project with the sn beam project to transfer the 103 sn beam project and to pay the advertising fees, and there was no possibility that it could obtain profits by receiving the advertising fees by not later than the end of May 2015, since the 103 sn beam project was not installed outside of the sn beam project and the amount borrowed in the name of the victims was paid by paying the installments of the amount borrowed in the name of other victims before.