A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, around 03:00 on June 14, 2017, in F of the operation of the Victim E (Gain, 54 years old) located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Gain, Gain, 54 years old), flue G and alcohol were returned to Korea, and flue G and flue G and flue G from the victim following the victim, and flue the victim’s flue, flue away from the floor, and flue his body and flue his body, and flu

Welves

The original facts charged were stated as "be off," but the defendant did not deviate from the victim's will in this court, because he did not resist the victim's name and brue by cutting the victim's upper and brue into the chest, and attempted to cut the chest by hand, and he did not deviate from the victim's will.

The above statement made by the defendant, and the above statement made by the defendant corresponds excessively to the victim's investigative agency's statement (37 pages of investigation records). Thus, this part was corrected ex officio.

Although I want to engage in sexual intercourse with the victim, I want to do so.

In this context, however, the victim's horses, "I am off, am off, am off, and am out," went to the restaurant entrance to turn out, and the victim did not come to rape by pushing the victim out of the restaurant and locking the door.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to E;

1. Response to a request for appraisal;

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that the Defendant’s photograph (the entire Defendant recognized the instant mistake as a whole, but did not hear the victim’s “slick and defective,” and did not cross the entrance door to extinguish fire, and that the victim’s slicking out of the restaurant, rather than locking the Defendant’s sexual desire, constituted an attempted suspension by having the Defendant committed an offense only by himself.

However, when examining the statements of the victim's investigative agency, the victim's "licker against the defendant"

was located on the gate and on the gate;

by inducing the defendant.