A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On October 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) made a false agreement on the lease of an apartment with his name, whereby the Defendant applied for a loan of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the apartment; and (b) made a false agreement on the lease of the lease of the apartment of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the purchase of the deposit of the deposit of the purchase of the deposit of the deposit of the purchase of the deposit of the deposit of the purchase of the deposit of the purchase of the deposit of the deposit of the purchase of the deposit of the purchase of the deposit of the purchase of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of KRW 220 million.

On November 28, 2014, the Defendant and his name Buddhistist submitted the aforementioned false apartment charter loan agreement to E, a new employee of the company that suffered damage in the so-called "Seoul Metropolitan Government Nown-gu coffee shop," and applied for a loan against security of the deposit for the lease on December 4, 2014. On December 4, 2014, the name Buddhistist, who was carried out with the Defendant and the Defendant's father, was waiting for the above D apartment No. 115 1003, the leased object and confirmed whether to move into the said E, and on December 5, 2014, the name Buddhistist, who was carried out as C on December 5, 2014, prepared and provided a written confirmation of the receipt of the notice of the transfer of the deposit for the lease deposit to F, the employee of the victimized company.

However, in fact, the defendant did not rent the above apartment as a whole, and was only done as if he moved into the above apartment as a whole with his name and incompetence.

The Defendant, in collusion with the name-free boxes, by deceiving the employees of the victimized company as above, received 139,925,000 won from the Defendant’s Agricultural Bank Account (G) under the name of the Defendant on December 8, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. The investigation report (the application for a suspect's loan and the person in charge of the due diligence of housing shall be reported to telephone communications);