logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.10.24 2013고단1784
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant: (a) around 00:20 on June 25, 2013, at the point of “E” operated by the victim D in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul; (b) at the request of the victim, the Defendant asked F who reported the above main points to provide alcohol; (c) but (d) the Defendant was not aware of it.

Accordingly, the Defendant saw the change of the victim's body in the toilet of the above main station as his hand so that the repair fee can be carried out, and the victim's market price located in the display stand in the main station 200,000 won of Chinese drinking 1 disease, which is located on the display stand in the main station, and broken down the road front of the main station.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

2. Around June 25, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective violence, deadly weapons, etc.) stated that “H” operated by the victim D (here, 58 years of age) in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu, said victim’s property was damaged as stated in paragraph (1), and that the victim said the victim was aware of the victim’s purchase of the Defendant’s test to the said F after drinking the said F, on the ground that the victim’s purchase of the her property was made without releasing the her property, such as paragraph (1). In doing so, the Defendant took a bath to read “low weather year, she must remove the her hack, hacker’s hick hick hick hick hicks, which is a dangerous object in front of the said Schlage, and she took the 110cm height to the left part.

3. On June 25, 2013, from around 00:25 to around 00:35 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s business, by force, prevented customers, who were entering the clock, from entering the clock on the ground of the fact that “the clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock cl

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the prosecution concerning D;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the act of violence, etc.;

arrow