A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 20, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 20:10 on the 20th 20th 20th 20th 20th 2013, the two states police boxes affiliated with the two states police boxes and slopeF sent out upon receiving a report that customers frank in front of the C cafeteria located in the T cafeteria B, and told them to return home; (b) however, the Defendant refused or obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers’ order by assaulting the E-mail of the victim police officer on one occasion of drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning police statements to E;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 136 (Selection of Imprisonment or Imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor, considering the fact that the sentencing reasons in Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act are many violent offenses against the accused, the extent of damage inflicted by police officers is minor and the accused reflects the crime, a suspended sentence shall be imposed and probation shall be imposed;