logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.02.13 2017나62785
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

(3) In light of the legal principles as to the evidence submitted by the plaintiff at the trial and the result of the party principal examination against the defendants at the trial court, the confirmation document of this case is not explicitly indicated in the form of contract or the contract price, and the evidence prepared by the defendants and submitted to the appellate court at the trial court at the trial of this case is different from the disposal document in the probative value as a confirmation of each fact, the above evidence alone prepared a false confirmation document of this case, and it is not sufficient to recognize that the appellate court at the trial of this case was subjected to deception, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise). 2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow