A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 29, 2014, at around 21:20, the Defendant assaulted a taxi engineer in front of the “D” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties regarding the handling of report 112 by assaulting the 112 report by assaulting the taxi engineer in front of the “D”, and sending the E box F, in order to identify the circumstances of the instant case, the Defendant: (a) took a bath for the Defendant to “Isknson to pay a fine,” without any reason to ask him “Isknson,” and, (b) took a bath for the Defendant to “Isknson and pay a fine.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of each police statement related to F and G;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 136 (Selection of Imprisonment or Imprisonment);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area of obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1 year and April): The defendant has been punished for violent crimes over 12 times; the defendant has a record of being punished for violent crimes; the crime is deemed to have been used by a police officer dispatched upon receipt of a report 112 without any reason; the nature of the crime is very unusual and unreasonable: The defendant's mistake is recognized and against the defendant; the defendant has no criminal record; the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, motive and circumstance of the crime; the means and consequence of the crime; and the circumstances after the crime, etc., all of the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments shall be determined as the order.