logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.12.11 2017고단4045
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 22, 2017, in front of the C cafeteria located in Ulsan-gu B, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, the Defendant: (a) in order to identify the circumstances of the instant case by the Defendant, the police officer belonging to the Ulsan-gu Police Station D District District, who was called out after receiving a report in relation to the conduct and dispute in the street; and (b) in order to identify the circumstances of the instant case by the Defendant.

“I, without any reason, ask the immediately preceding Hashes E to conduct a match “I, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am. I am. I am. I am.

“The police officer, who is a police official belonging to the same police officer, was tightly pushed the f's chest with her body and her body with a glass disease containing a flavoring, and assaulted the 112 police officer's chest E with his/her glring, with his/her glife with his/her glife with his/her glife, and obstructed the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 Report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling List;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine (the first offense, or various circumstances shown in the records and pleadings, such as the details of the offense, the degree of reflectivity, and the degree of assault);

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 70(1) of the Criminal Act) / [Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion] of the Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant was physically and mentally weak at the time of committing the instant crime, but the Defendant does not accept such assertion in light of various circumstances indicated in the

arrow