1. On August 26, 2014, the Defendant’s disposition of bereaved family benefits and funeral expense against the Plaintiff shall be revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 1, 2012, the deceased B (CB; hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) entered an Asan Factory as a career-based employee. On March 11, 2014, the deceased on March 11, 2014, which was written at around 16:00, and was written at around 22:00 on March 14, 2014, and died at the age of 34 years.

B. On August 26, 2014, the Plaintiff, the deceased’s spouse, claimed bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses to the Defendant on the ground of the deceased’s death. On the ground that “In light of the deceased’s duty of duties, time of duties, intensity of duties, etc., it is not confirmed that the deceased received an occupational physical or mental heavy load to the extent that it could have obvious influence on the normal function of the cerebrovascular prior to the outbreak, and thus, it is difficult to recognize a proximate causal relation with the deceased’s duties, on the ground that the cause of death was determined to have deteriorated by natural progress, and thus, it is difficult to recognize a causal relation with the deceased’s duties.”

C. The Plaintiff’s request for review was dismissed on December 12, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2-1, Gap evidence 2-2, Gap evidence 4-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the deceased died due to occupational malpractice and mental stress following the Technology Declaration was unlawful.

B. Facts 1) The deceased’s health checkup conducted in 201 144/94mHg (less than 120/80 of normal Accom) (less than 120/80 of normal Accom), the General Caller 218g/dl (less than 200 of normal Accom 200), HDL- caller 52g/dl (at least 60 of normal Accom 60), Trilycer 406g/dl (less than normal Accom 100-150), the comprehensive assessment conducted normal, B, the suspicions of general diseases, high pressure, or urine diseases (persons subject to second examination) in 2013, and the suspicions of blood pressure 160/100 normal Hg (hereinafter referred to as “Accom 1200. 10. 20.