beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant seems to be a clerical error in the facts charged around April 30, 2013.
Using the fact that the victim C(60 years of age, female, 40 years of age, female, 10 years of age, 38 years of age, 10 years of age, 10 years of age, 20 years of age, 20 years of age, 38 years of age, 20 years of age, 38 years of age, 30 years of age, 20 years of age,
On April 30, 2013, the Defendant prepared a letter of post at his own house located in Busan-si, Seocheon-gu, Seoul-si, and sent it to the victims with the purport that “The mother made a liverion with the village father’s village father where she is living together with the present husband after living together with 5 years between the present husband and the present husband, among his own consciousness, she prepared a letter of post to the effect that “When the victims do not comply with the above demand of the Defendant, the Defendant would inform the outside of the contents indicated in the letter of post, such as inter-Korean, living together before marriage, marriage, childbirth, etc.
From that time until May 31, 2013, the Defendant attempted to attack victims on a total of 13 occasions, such as the list of crimes in the annexed sheet, and received approximately KRW 300,000,00 from that time, but failed to comply with such request and attempted.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Each legal statement of witness D, C, and E;
1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;
1. The defendant asserts that the defendant's argument on the letter of postal service used for the attack is that the contents of the letter of postal service in this case are true, and that the defendant's sending of the letter of postal service cannot be considered as a "act of conflict", and that there was no intention of conflict.
Intimidation as a means of the crime of threat is freedom of human decision-making.