The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal in this case brought a lawsuit against the defendant for divorce trial and consolation money against the defendant. Accordingly, the defendant is only contested against the cause and responsibility of the failure of marriage, and there was an agreement with the intention of divorce by submitting a written statement with the consent to divorce. Thus, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case. Thus, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. In a case where the judgment party has no intention to continue the marriage and there exists a mutual agreement with the intention of divorce, even if the marital relationship remains legally, it shall be deemed that the declaration of intention corresponding to the end, which is the prior consent to the adultery, is included in the agreement. In the absence of such agreement, even if the intention of divorce is expressed by both parties temporarily, temporarily, and on a temporary basis, it does not constitute a case of inter-conception (Supreme Court Decision 2000Do868 Decided July 7, 200). The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., “F” against the defendant on August 8, 201, on the ground that “the spouse’s wrongful act, bad faith, deadly unfair treatment from his spouse or his lineal ascendant, or any other serious reason for which it is difficult to continue the marriage,” the defendant brought a divorce lawsuit against the defendant on the ground that the defendant brought a written answer against the divorce to the effect that the latter both of the Defendant and the Defendant brought a written answer to divorce to the effect.