The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On November 26, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement on the charge of the instant charges that “A victim E does not want to work any more at a drinking house; KRW 3 million is required to pay the DNA prepaid payment. If the Defendant borrowed money at a restaurant, he/she will pay 50,000 won per month even if he/she works at a restaurant.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not think of the use of the money in full in full, and he thought that it was difficult for the defendant to live with the monthly income of the defendant, and there was no intention or ability to pay the money even if he borrowed money from the victim.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 1 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of F on the same day, and received KRW 2 million from the same account under the same name on the 28th day of the same month, and received KRW 18.9 million in total from around that time to May 3, 201, as shown in the separate list of crimes, from around 12 times, as shown in the separate list of crimes.

2. The major evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case is that E’s investigative agency and this court made a statement. According to the records, E transfers KRW 3 million to the Defendant on November 26, 2010 and on December 28, 2010, after having known the Defendant that the said money was not used for the purpose of paying the prepaid amount through a “D” drinking house proprietor during the police officer on December 2, 2010, while sending KRW 1 million to the Defendant on December 24, 2010 on the pretext of paying the prepaid amount, and again remitting KRW 1 million on January 3, 201. This is rather than by deception from the Defendant, but rather by considering the circumstances that the Defendant was making it difficult for the Defendant to make a marriage at the time at the time, the Defendant’s body is too good.