logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.07.14 2016고단413
축산물위생관리법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates Pyeongtaek-si processing factory in mutual name.

1. The Minister of Food and Drug Safety may determine and publicly announce the standards for labeling of livestock products for sale, and as above, livestock products that have been manufactured shall carry indications in conformity with such standards, and shall not be sold, or processed, packaged, stored, transported or displayed for sale, without labeling;

Nevertheless, on September 21, 2015, the Defendant processed and stored for sale 10,80 equipment in the D’s storage room, which was purchased at the 'E' boundary located in the Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do.

2. A person who operates a livestock product processing business shall have facilities meeting the standards prescribed by Ordinance of the Prime Minister;

Nevertheless, on September 21, 2015, the Defendant manufactured a liquid product containing a mixture of normal eggs and a maximum amount of eggs because it did not have a disturbance, even if it is necessary to remove the upper eggs, eggs, and eggs through the inspection box at the time of manufacturing the liquid eggs.

3. A livestock product processing business operator and an employee of a livestock product processing business operator shall prepare and keep a record of the details of products manufactured using raw materials and recorded the details of such sales in order to grasp the capacity of production and sales. Documents concerning raw materials storage, production, work records, documents pertaining to raw materials storage, production date, production volume, sales place, sales volume, etc. for each production unit of products;

Nevertheless, the defendant from August 27, 2015 to the same year.

9. Until December 21, 200, the applicant did not prepare documents on receipts and disbursements of raw materials, production sites, and transaction details.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made to F by the police officer in charge of crackdown;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Article 45(6)2, Article 6(3), Article 45(6)7, and Article 21(1) of the Sanitary Control of Livestock Products Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow