logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.05.27 2014가합6309
물품대금
Text

1. Defendant B and the primary Defendant B pay the following amount to the Plaintiff:

(a) 18,361,730 won;

B. The above A.

subsection (b).

Reasons

As to the claim stated in paragraph (1) of the claim, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (as to the claim in paragraph (1) of the claim, the number is included; hereinafter the same shall apply)

In addition to the whole arguments, the defendant B is obligated to pay the plaintiff the unpaid price of KRW 18,361,730 and the interest or delay damages thereon, from April 14, 2010 to May 10, 2013.

In addition to the overall purport of the pleadings in the statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 against defendant C (hereinafter "Defendant C"), the defendant C is liable to pay the plaintiff the unpaid amount of KRW 51,979,010 and the delay damages therefrom.

On June 30, 2013, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff supplied the goods equivalent to KRW 18,880,000 to Defendant B around the first place, and that the goods were supplied to Defendant C in the first place.

It is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff supplied the goods equivalent to KRW 18,80,000 to Defendant B on June 30, 2013 only on the basis of the descriptions of the health class, Gap evidence 1 through 3, 5, and 7 as to the primary argument, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

The plaintiff's primary argument is without merit.

According to the overall purport of the statements and arguments as to the preliminary argument, the plaintiff supplied the goods to Defendant C for the automatic tax collection of KRW 18,880,000 on June 30, 2013.

arrow