logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2019.02.19 2018고정942
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, around January 1, 2018, up to 2018, up to 2018, up to 2018, up to 200,00 won, posted an advertisement letter related to the business side business at the Defendant’s home of Seocheon-gu Seocheon-gu B apartment C through the Internet site D car page, and proposed that E be paid an allowance if the head of the team who reported and contacted E is the head of the team demanding the business sub-business to seek the business sub-business operator, and suggested E to post an advertisement "F" on his/her personal block, and reported this to the victim G who visited him/her, “I send materials necessary for the side business if he/she deposits KRW 20,000 of the deposit money for the materials on condition that he/she is engaged in the side business. If the completed product with the materials is sent, I would pay KRW 25,000 and deposit KRW 20,000.”

However, in fact, the defendant was planning to acquire the security money under the pretext of allowing the side business, and there was no intention or ability to pay the side business fees to the victim by allowing the non-craft side business.

On January 1, 2018, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 25,000 won as a security deposit from the victim’s H bank account (I) in E’s name, and received 75,000 won in total from the K bank account (I) in the name of J on January 7, 2018, and acquired 10,000 won in total under the same name as K bank account (I) in the name of J on January 7, 2018.

Around November 30, 2017, the Defendant posted an advertisement stating that “a person recruits a business side business” on LP, an Internet site, and falsely read that “the security deposit for the materials sent to a side business is required” to the victim M who has contacted with the Defendant.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to repay even if the defendant had the victim engage in the business craft or received the deposit therefor.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 70,000 won as a deposit money from the victim to the K Bank account (O) in the name of N on the same day.

b)a summary of the evidence;

arrow