A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 20:30 on August 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) expressed that, at the Yansan-gu, the Defendant: (b) Yansan-si, the Defendant: (c) was able to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender of the former Yansan-gu D District of the Police Station D District; (b) he expressed that the Defendant was able to arrest the Defendant, who was on his own influor; (c) “Chhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhn; and (d) Hahhhhhhhhhhhhnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn; (d, (e) twice.

Accordingly, as seen above, H attempted to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender with obstruction of performance of official duties, “Y,” “I,” and “H’s clothes fluortly and pushed off,” and “H’s arms.” As a result, G committed assault, such as fluoring H’s flaps and ebbbbing H’s flaps, and ebbing H’s part of H’s flaps, by taking advantage of his flag’s flaps, while engaging in the blapsing of “pherb.”

이후 피고인은 공무집행방해로 현행범인 체포되어 전주시 완산구 D지구대에서, 계속해서 소란을 피우면서 H의 얼굴에 침을 뱉고, H의 허벅지 부분을 발로 1회 찼다.

As a result, in collusion with I and G, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch and investigation of police officers on the spot, and at the same time, the Defendant jointly conducted a h (38 years of age) with the victim H about about 10 days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of G and I;

1. Each police statement made to H, E, and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 2(2) and Article 2(1)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning a crime, the Criminal Act.