A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2019. 7. 14. 02:50경 천안시 동남구 B에 있는 ‘C’ 앞길에서 술에 취하여 친구인 D을 때리는 등 싸움을 하여 112신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 천안동남경찰서 E파출소 소속 경사 F와 경장 G에 의해 현행범인 체포를 당하자 이에 항의하면서 위 F에게 발길질하다가 얼굴에 침을 1회 뱉고 손톱으로 위 F의 손목 부위를 잡아 뜯고, 위 G의 얼굴에 침을 1회 뱉고 발로 위 G의 허벅지 부위를 수회 걷어찼다.

As above, the Defendant interfered with the above police officers’ legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports and arrest of flagrant offenders, etc., and, at the same time, committed large-scale composts and sponsories in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment to victims G (ma, 35 years of age).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Each statement of D and H;

1. An injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Application of the police-related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is very bad: Provided, That consideration, such as the primary offender, and the fact that damaged police officers do not want the punishment of the accused;