The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) does not have any time when the victim was the victim as stated in the facts charged in this case, and the victim was merely a false statement in the investigative agency and the court below to take advantage of favorable status when filing a divorce lawsuit against the defendant, and thus, the statements of the victim and the victim E cannot be reliable. Thus, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts of the facts charged in this case and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. We examine the judgment of the court below, and the defendant argued the same purport as the reasons for appeal in this part. The court below rejected the above argument in detail with the statement of the defendant in the judgment (Nos. 11 through 20, No. 3, No. 5, and No. 13). In particular, the above E reported at around 112 on August 14, 2017, which is the day of the instant case, and the victim complained of damages to police officers dispatched. ② The victim was under the diagnosis of the "dul, dul, spawl, spawl swl swl swl swl swl swl swl swl swl swl swl swl swl swl swl swl swl swl swl swl swl swl swl sw swl sw sw swl sw sw sw sw swl sw