The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant only did dispute with E on the day of the instant case and did not dispute with the victim D, and that the victim D did not have a place where the Defendant had a dispute with E, and that the lower court found the Defendant guilty of all the facts charged in the instant case is an unlawful determination of facts.

2. In full view of the facts charged in this case, the defendant suffered from the upper part of the victim D's left part, and the health stand as to whether the victim expressed his desire, and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, D, E, F, G, etc. were gathered in Cry field around May 12, 2012, and the defendant asserted that he purchased the above dry field from I around 190, around 190, around 190, he saw that he son et al. al. al slick on the above dry field, and she slicked about the 5th day of this case, and caused the defendant to slick off the d's d's slick on the south's ground, and that he slicked the d's d's slick to the defendant and the defendant's d's d's d's d's d's d'.

According to the above facts and records, even if the victim D had sold posts on a mobile phone in light of the fact that the victim D was older than 72 years of age, its upper part can be clean, and D is the defendant.