Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

B From July 1, 2003 to February 28, 2014, in Yangsan-si Co., Ltd., a person who has been engaged in business affairs such as management of customers, receipt of products, supply, and collection of money, while working as the director of a business team in the business team D, a person who has been engaged in business affairs such as management of customers, receipt of goods, supply, and collection, and the defendant from August 8, 2005 to June 8, 2005.

The Defendant and B were in charge of the collection of the pelpel paper supplied at the request of the victim's transaction partner (state) package, and when there is a difference between the price of the pel paper actually supplied to the victim's (state) package and the price of the pel paper actually paid to the (state) package for reasons such as the price of the personnel in charge of the business team's office, the Defendant and B were in charge of the collection of the pel paper in charge of the business team's business, and there was a difference between the price of the pel paper actually supplied to the (state) package and the price of the gatter actually paid to the (state) package.

A. On December 10, 2013, the Defendant and B, such as electronic records, connected to the ERP program, which is a computer program in which information such as the receipt of goods, production, supply, etc. of the company, is entered, with a view to making the victim’s pelle orders and the collection of the funds for the purchase of goods at the above D office. B, upon request from the Plaintiff on November 5, 2013, connected to the pelP program, which is a computer program in which information such as the receipt of goods, production, and supply of goods, etc. of the company, was entered, and then, upon request from the Plaintiff on November 5, 2013, ordered the Defendant to enter it into the pelP program, the original item code “SK180 AK180 K180, relatively relatively low unit code of goods “S120 S120 S.,” and the Defendant modified the B’s order to enter it into the price of goods, other than the original items supplied.

As a result, the defendant and B conspireded to forge the computer program of the victim who is an electronic record of others on fact proof.

The Defendant and B shall do so from that time to January 9, 2014 in the same manner as above.