1. The Defendant on August 11, 2016 with respect to the vehicles stated in the attached list to the Plaintiff on the ground of the termination of the consignment management contract.

1. The fact of recognition that the Plaintiff, on May 27, 200, belongs to the Defendant and the Defendant indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) on the outside, the ownership, operation, and management right of the instant vehicle shall be reverted to the Defendant. In the inside, the Plaintiff, the borrower, entered into a truck entrustment management contract under which the Plaintiff would operate and manage the instant vehicle and pay the entrusted management fee to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant contract”), and entered into the ownership registration of the instant vehicle in the future with the Defendant; and the fact that the duplicate of the instant complaint containing the Plaintiff’s intent to terminate the instant contract, delivered to the Defendant on August 11, 2016, does not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the respective entries in subparagraphs A and 2 and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant is externally entrusted to the defendant who is the company to which the plaintiff belongs the name of the vehicle in question and belongs to the company to which the ownership and the right to manage the operation of the vehicle belongs. However, within the country, the contract is in the form of a combination of title trust and the elements of delegation, the purport of which is to pay a certain amount of management expenses every month under the name of the defendant to manage the external management of the vehicle in question, such as being entrusted with the right to manage the operation of the vehicle in question and paying the fees, taxes, public charges, etc. for using the defendant's registered name, etc. In this contract, the plaintiff who is in the position of the truster and the truster can terminate the contract of this case at any time, and since the contract of this case was duly terminated on August 11, 2016.

Therefore, on August 11, 2016, the Defendant is obligated to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration for the instant automobile to the Plaintiff on the ground of termination of the instant contract.