logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.06.15 2016가단493
자동차소유권이전등록
Text

1. On February 15, 2016, the Defendant terminated the consignment management contract to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The facts of recognition are as follows: (a) around May 1999, the Plaintiff entered into a truck entrustment contract with the Defendant to transfer the ownership, operation, and management right to the Defendant on the outside of May 1, 199; (b) the borrower, while operating and managing the instant motor vehicle, entered into the same contract on August 3, 2004 with the replacement of the motor vehicle into the same contract on October 10, 2013; (c) the fact that the copy of the complaint of this case where the Plaintiff was sent to the Defendant on February 15, 2016 does not conflict between the parties, or that the Plaintiff, as the borrower, was liable to pay the entrusted management fee to the Defendant; and (d) concluded the same contract on August 3, 2004 with the replacement of the motor vehicle into the vehicle with the attached list on October 10, 203; or (d) there is no counter-proof evidence by taking into account the entire entries and arguments in subparagraphs A through 1 through 4 (including the serial number).

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant is externally entrusted to the defendant who is the company to which the plaintiff belongs the name of the vehicle in question and belongs to the company to which the ownership and the right to manage the operation of the vehicle belongs. However, within the country, the contract of this case was lawfully terminated on February 15, 2016 on the ground that the title trust and the elements of delegation are combined with the fact that the plaintiff who is in the position of the truster and the truster are entitled to terminate the contract of this case at any time, and the copy of the complaint of this case containing the plaintiff's declaration of intent to terminate the contract of this case was delivered to the defendant, and thus the contract of this case was lawfully terminated on February 15, 2016.

Therefore, the defendant.

arrow