logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원(춘천) 2019.07.22 2018누1201
위법건축물시정명령처분취소 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even in light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance by the plaintiff 7 to 8-4, which were submitted to this court.

Therefore, the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow