logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019.11.28.선고 2019도5892 판결
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)·뇌물수수·부정청탁및금품등수수의금지에관한법률위반
Cases

A. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery)

B. Acceptance of bribe

(c) Violation of the Improper Solicitation and Graft Act;

Defendant

A person shall be appointed.

Appellant

Defendant and Prosecutor

Defense Counsel

Law Firm Gwangju (Attorney Lee Jong-soo et al., Counsel for defendant-appellant)

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2018Do2747 Decided April 26, 2019

Imposition of Judgment

November 28, 2019

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. On the grounds of appeal by the public prosecutor, the lower court acquitted the public prosecutor on the ground that there was no proof of the crime regarding the bribery part among the facts charged in the instant case and the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery). Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of the logical and empirical rules

2. On the grounds of appeal by the Defendant, the lower court acknowledged that the instant indictment procedure cannot be deemed null and void in violation of the provisions of the Act, and that the evidence obtained during the investigation process does not constitute illegally collected evidence, and found the Defendant guilty of violating the Improper Solicitation and Graft Act among the facts charged in the instant case. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the relevant legal principles and the record, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the jurisdiction of the military court, the validity of indictment, and

3. Conclusion

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Park Jae-young

Justices Kim Jong-soo

Justices Kwon Soon-il

Justices Lee Ki-taik

Justices Park Jung-hwa

arrow