1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 17, 2001, the Plaintiff, who was a nationality of Pakistan, entered the Republic of Korea with the status of non-professional employment (E-9) sojourn, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on November 25, 2015.

B. On February 12, 2016, the Defendant rendered a decision on the recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute a case of “a well-founded fear that would be subject to persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.

C. The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on March 18, 2016, but the said objection was dismissed on the same ground as October 27, 2016.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 3, 4, Eul 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. In the Plaintiff’s assertion Pakistan, Musstan divided Muslim into a religious strike, such as dynas, hynas, hynas, Walz, and there is little terrorism, murder, violence, and intimidation against the other species of the strike.

In fact, there are about 7% of the Pakistan population, about 20% of the Pacific population, and about 20% of the Pacific population, and a large number of times, such as the attacking and schooling of a small number of times, the cruel religious dispute has not ceased.

The Plaintiff and their families were threatened by the threat from Sim-Saba (Sipah-e-Sabab) which is a Simpha-Saba, a Simpha spatha, and in 1995, the Plaintiff was killed in the 1995, and there was little violence against Simph-Sa-Laba in the atmosphere of tree from the persons of Simpha-Laba, and the relationship between the Plaintiff and the South East-Labatha of Simpha on June 27, 2009, when the Plaintiff was going to go from Simph-Lamba on the 20th of Simpha, and the remaining students were killed in the fast of the fam and sustained with their arms and shoulder.

Therefore, the possibility of gambling is high when the plaintiff returned to the country of nationality.