Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are people living in the D Park in So-gu, So-gu, Cheongju-si.

The Defendants, around 15:00 on December 3, 2020, had been aware of who she had been shed and had been shed about about 3 days before the E Centers in the foregoing D Park and had been shed about about 3 days before the E Centers in the E Park.

The question of Defendant B, “,” on the ground that the victim respondeds to the face without brush, Defendant B sent back the victim, etc. to the aftermath of the victim, and Defendant B assaulted the victim, such as her drinking, her head, her head, her body, her body, and her body.

As a result, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim as above, and caused the victim to suffer about three weeks of treatment, and caused the diversity of the two sides to the victim and the injury of the two sides.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate of injury, photograph of victim, record of seizure, and list of seizure;

1. Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act is that the crime of this case was committed jointly by the Defendants, thereby causing injury to the victim.

One kind of injury suffered by the victim is relatively more severe, and the defendants recognize all of their crimes of this case, and do not repeat the crime of this case in the future and are able to live faithfully.

Defendant

A has no record of criminal punishment except for criminal punishment twice by a fine, and Defendant B is subject to criminal punishment heavier than a fine after 2010.