logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.08.07 2014고단3059
강제추행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

At around 10:00 on October 31, 2013, the Defendant: (a) called “A victim E, who was aware of in the course of performing the public service of viewing and listening to a view by a view from a wild field located in Sinsi-si, Sin Sinsi,” saying “I shall go to the present time,” and said, by hand, the victim’s shoulder was frightened, thrings a bridge, thrings the bridge, and goes beyond the victim’s body as he lost his balance.”

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the body of the 12 chest with which the period of treatment can not be known to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant's physical balance is not a crime of injury to the defendant, since the defendant was placed on the bridge, such as this part of the facts charged, and there is no fact that the defendant was placed on the bridge as stated in this part of the facts charged.

In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the following evidence, i.e., ① the victim E consistently from the investigative agency to this court; ② the defendant who was next to the victim stated that he was in excess of his own body and suffered bodily injury as stated in its reasoning after going beyond his own balance; ② the defendant and the victim’s wife consistently appeared to the effect that the defendant was covering the victim with the victim’s bridge while going beyond the victim’s bridge and going beyond the victim’s bridge. In particular, F’s statement is consistent with the victim’s statement; ③ the defendant could have sufficiently anticipated that the victim could suffer bodily injury if he goes beyond the victim’s body, and thus, the defendant could sufficiently recognize the fact that the defendant had inflicted bodily injury beyond the victim.

arrow